Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00497
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Meyer et al v. Havens et al
as 4:2022cv01247
Plaintiff:
Krista Meyer, K.J., K.A. and others
Defendant:
Officer Tyson Havens, 1-5 John/Jane Doe and John/Jane Doe 1-20
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01424
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02132
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02194
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
BRETT v. RUFFIN et al
as 2:2014cv04445
Plaintiff:
FRANK BRETT
Defendant:
PHYLLIS RUFFIN, ERIKA UNKNOWN, CRYSTAL UNKNOWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRETT v. HILL et al
as 2:2012cv06943
Plaintiff:
FRANK BRETT
Defendant:
PHYLISS HILL, PHYLISS RUFFIN, LAURA GREEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ZIED-CAMPBELL et al v. THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2011cv07544
Plaintiff:
MINDY JAYE ZIED-CAMPBELL and DENNIS JOHN CAMPBELL
Defendant:
THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, LINDA L. KELLY, THOMAS W. CORBETT, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RUFFIN v. RADIO SHACK et al
as 2:2010cv00471
Plaintiff:
ROSALYN RUFFIN
Defendant:
RADIO SHACK, RADIO SHACK CORPORATION and ZBIGNIEW STANKIEWICZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Public Accomodations)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00183
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
