Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Spath et al v. County of Santa Clara et al
as 3:2022cv07599
Plaintiff:
Noah Spath and Tim Spath
Defendant:
County of Santa Clara and Santa Clara Valley Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv09879
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Egge v. County of Santa Clara et al
as 5:2017cv02842
Plaintiff:
Melissa Egge
Defendant:
County of Santa Clara, Santa Clara Valley Medical Center, John Stirling and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv03113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00776
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv05848
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Karl Wichelman, et al v. Santa Clara County, et al
as 12-16485
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KARL WICHELMAN and ANNE SABETTA
Defendant - Appellee:
SANTA CLARA COUNTY, California, SANTA CLARA VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER, AKA VMC, WILLIAM JENSEN, Administrative Law Judge, Dr. and others
Kats et al v. Stanford Hospitals & Clinics et al
as 5:2011cv06379
Defendant:
A. Hillel, Sequoia Hospital, Palo Alto Medical Foundation ("PAMF") and others
Plaintiff:
Jay Kats, Edward Kats, August Kats and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv05643
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Ordonio et al v. County of Santa Clara et al
as 3:2011cv04570
Plaintiff:
Leonard Ordonio and Claudia Ordonio
Defendant:
County of Santa Clara , County of Santa Clara Valley Medical Center , Alfonso Banuelos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
