Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01186
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01160
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Lopez v. Catholic Family Services of Waterbury CT
as 3:2026cv01089
Plaintiff:
Rodolfo Lopez
Defendant:
Catholic Family Services of Waterbury CT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mrkic v. Ambassador Wheelchair Services, Inc.
as 3:2026cv00837
Plaintiff:
Zekerijah Mrkic
Defendant:
Ambassador Wheelchair Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Decosta v. Adams et al
as 3:2026cv00774
Plaintiff:
Sterling Decosta
Defendant:
Richard G. Adams, Frederic Gilman, Katherine Y. Hutchinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00661
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Salvador v. Constitution State Services LLC
as 3:2026cv00560
Plaintiff:
Latrice Salvador
Defendant:
Constitution State Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Smith v. Department of Social Services
as 3:2026cv00537
Plaintiff:
Darren Smith
Defendant:
Department of Social Services, Andrea Barton Reeves and Paul Bourdoulous
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00473
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
