Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00563
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00550
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Ferraro v. Wall et al
as 2:2026cv00377
Defendant:
Carol Martin, Danielle Vizza, Cory Robert Wall and others
Plaintiff:
Michele Ferraro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nguyen v. United Parcel Service Inc
as 2:2026cv00356
Plaintiff:
Long T Nguyen
Defendant:
United Parcel Service Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Baker v. Utah County et al
as 2:2026cv00268
Plaintiff:
Staci M. Baker an individual formerly doing business as Maple Mountain English Cream
Defendant:
Utah County, North Utah Valley Animal Services Special Service District, South Utah Valley Aminal Services District and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00210
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00033
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132 Americans with Disabilities Act - Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Employment)
Fowers v. State of Utah et al
as 1:2026cv00026
Plaintiff:
Robert Fowers
Defendant:
State of Utah, Office of Recovery Services, Davis County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00155
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
