Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01328
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01533
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv04649
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Ellis v. City of Grand Prairie et al
as 3:2023cv01508
Plaintiff:
Eric L. Ellis
Defendant:
City of Grand Prairie, Grand Prairie Officer T. Steele, Grand Prairie Officer Frazier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ellis v. City of Grand Prairie et al
as 4:2023cv00684
Plaintiff:
Eric L. Ellis
Defendant:
City of Grand Prairie, Grand Prairie Officer T. Steele, Grand Prairie Officer Frazier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Steel et al
as 5:2023cv00229
Plaintiff:
Micheal D. Johnson
Defendant:
Gary L. Steel, Francisco A. Argenal and Bradley D. Graham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Steele v. KNAP et al
as 4:2023cv00150
Plaintiff:
Raymond Patrick Steele, Jr
Defendant:
FNU KNAP, FNU Regan, Brian LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv02682
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
