Civil Rights Cases
Sternberg v. Warneck et al
as 2:2023cv02022
Plaintiff: Michael C Sternberg
Defendant: Shelley Warneck, Tristan Aeschleman, Cindy Hendrickson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
v. SHAO et al
as 2:2022at00196
Defendant: Yi Tai SHAO, John G. Roberts, Jr., Anthony M Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv04781
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
SHAO v. KENNEDY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv01233
Plaintiff: YI TAI SHAO
Defendant: JOHN G. ROBERTS, ANTHONY M. KENNEDY, CLARENCE THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv05914
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Mendez v. Santa Clara County Superior Court et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00623
Plaintiff: Manuel Mendez
Defendant: Santa Clara County Superior Court, David H. Yamasaki and P. Kotsubo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilbert Marosi v. Conrad Rushing, et al
as 14-16040
Plaintiff - Appellant: GILBERT MAROSI
Defendant - Appellee: CONRAD RUSHING, Presiding Justice Sixth District Court of Appeals, EUGENE M. PREMO, NATHAN D. MIHARA, Associate Justice and others
Gilbert Marosi v. Conrad Rushing, et al
as 14-16040
Plaintiff / Appellant: GILBERT MAROSI
Defendant / Appellee: CONRAD RUSHING, Presiding Justice Sixth District Court of Appeals, EUGENE M. PREMO, NATHAN D. MIHARA, Associate Justice and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2014cv01487
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?