Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Gold Creek Foods, LLC et al v. City of Dawsonville, Georgia et al
as 2:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
Gold Creek Foods, LLC and Gold Creek Processing, LLC
Counter Claimant:
City of Dawsonville, Georgia
Defendant:
John Walden, Caleb Phillips, William Illg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv04682
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Callaway-Ingram v. Pike County, Georgia et al
as 3:2013cv00203
Plaintiff:
Marcia Callaway-Ingram
Defendant:
Pike County, Georgia , Bill Sawyer , Doug Mangham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. DeKalb County, Georgia et al
as 1:2012cv00539
Plaintiff:
Willie D. Carter
Defendant:
DeKalb County, Georgia , Bruce C. Brueggeman , Albert L. Mitchum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Georgia State Conference of the NAACP et al v. Fayette County Board of Commissioners et al
as 3:2011cv00123
Plaintiff:
Georgia State Conference of the NAACP , Fayette County Branch NAACP , Henry Adams and others
Defendant:
Fayette County Board of Commissioners, Herb Frady, Robert Horgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv03013
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv02623
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008cv00164
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01628
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (other)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
