Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00669
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE et al v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2020cv03121
Defendant:
EUGENE SCALIA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and DONALD J. TRUMP
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL FAIR HOUSING ALLIANCE and NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LI et al v. SCALIA et al
as 1:2020cv01933
Plaintiff:
STACEY KING and LEI LI
Defendant:
EUGENE SCALIA, STEVE SISOLAK and NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT, TRAINING & REHABILITATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'DIAH v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 1:2016cv00336
Plaintiff:
AROR ARK O'DIAH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. REECE et al
as 1:2013cv01610
Plaintiff:
KENNETH L. SMITH
Defendant:
DEANELLE TACHA REECE, ANTONIN G. SCALIA, CLARENCE THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. SCALIA et al
as 1:2013cv00298
Plaintiff:
KENNETH L. SMITH
Defendant:
ANTONIN SCALIA, CLARENCE THOMAS, JOHN G. ROBERTS, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JONES v. UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT et al
as 1:2010cv00910
Plaintiff:
DONALD G. JONES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, WILLIAM K. SUTER, GAIL JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
SMITH v. THOMAS et al
as 1:2009cv01926
Plaintiff:
KENNETH L. SMITH
Defendant:
CLARENCE THOMAS, ANTONIN G. SCALIA, JOHN G. ROBERTS, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
SIBLEY v. ALITO et al
as 1:2008cv01797
Plaintiff:
MONTGOMERY BLAIR SIBLEY
Defendant:
SAMUEL ANTHONY ALITO, JR., STEPHEN G. BREYER, RUTH BADER GINSBURG and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
