Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00085
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clark v. Bendapudi et al
as 3:2021cv00480
Plaintiff:
Austin Roy Clark
Defendant:
Neeli Bendapudi, Lori Gonzales, Toni M. Ganzel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaw v. McCracken County Fiscal Court et al
as 5:2019cv00045
Plaintiff:
Manning Shaw
Defendant:
Tonya Ray, McCracken County Fiscal Court and Unknown Medical Providers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00070
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00005
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv00302
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sosa v. Innwood Condominium Owners Association Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00825
Plaintiff:
Jonas Sosa, Sr.
Defendant:
Innwood Condominium Owners Association Inc., David Parks, Jr., Julia Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Autrey v. City of Louisville, Kentucky et al
as 3:2012cv00329
Plaintiff:
Sherita Autrey
Defendant:
City of Louisville, Kentucky, Louisville Metropolitan Police Department, Steve Conrad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shaw et al v. Kentucky Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control et al
as 1:2011cv00024
Plaintiff:
Gregory K. Shaw , Floyd Back and Dr. Vijay Jain
Defendant:
Kentucky Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control , Commonwealth of Kentucky , Thomas H. Skaggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2009cv00270
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. - Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
