Cases 1 - 10 of 10
VARVAREZIS v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2022cv06670
Plaintiff:
GEORGE VARVAREZIS
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv13643
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv13505
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv13506
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JULIANA V. TOWNSHIP OF WASHINGTON, ET AL.
as 1:2016cv08648
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JULIANA
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF WASHINGTON , SHERI DONOVAN , JOHN ARMANO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RAMOS et al v. RARITAN VALLEY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY et al
as 3:2016cv01938
Plaintiff:
LAURA RAMOS and CYNTHIA BAKER
Defendant:
RARITAN VALLEY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY, JIM RICHART, JOYCE JONAT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
BANKS v. PIVNICHNY et al
as 1:2015cv03368
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
TIMOTHY PIVNICHNY, BARACK OBAMA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PANARELLO et al v. CITY OF VINELAND et al
as 1:2012cv04165
Plaintiff:
JOHN PANARELLO and SHERI PANARELLO
Defendant:
CITY OF VINELAND, TIMOTHY CODISPOTI, OFFICER ADAM SHAW and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv06481
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
KAETZ v. KAETZ et al
as 2:2011cv02663
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM F. KAETZ
Defendant:
CORNELIA A. KAETZ, KRISTIE L. BEITLER, JONATHAN MARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
