Cases 1 - 7 of 7
John Harmon, et al v. Hamilton County, Ohio, et al
as 15-4125
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOHN HARMON and STEPHANIE HARMON
Defendant:
HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO, HAMILTON COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, SHERIFF, HAMILTON COUNTY and others
Defendant - Appellant:
SHAWN COX, RYAN WOLF, MATTHEW WISSEL and others
John Harmon, et al v. Hamilton County, Ohio, et al
as 15-4117
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOHN HARMON and STEPHANIE HARMON
Defendant:
HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO, HAMILTON COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, SHERIFF, HAMILTON COUNTY and others
Defendant - Appellant:
RYAN WOLF, MATTHEW WISSEL, JOHN HAYNES, Patrol Officers, In their Official and Individual Capacities and others
Optotraffic, LLC v. Sheriff, Hamilton County et al
as 1:2013cv00636
Plaintiff:
Optotraffic, LLC
Defendant:
Sheriff, Hamilton County and Hamilton County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harmon et al v. Hamilton County, Ohio et al
as 1:2010cv00911
Plaintiff:
John Harmon and Stephanie Harmon
Defendant:
Hamilton County, Ohio , Hamilton County Board of County Commissioners , Sheriff, Hamilton County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Weatherford v. Sheriff Hamilton County et al
as 2:2009cv00581
Plaintiff:
Michael Weatherford
Defendant:
Sheriff Hamilton County, Sheriff Franklin County, Deputy Sheriff Correctional Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Weatherford v. Sheriff Hamilton County et al
as 1:2009cv00432
Plaintiff:
Michael Weatherford
Defendant:
Sheriff Hamilton County, Sheriff Franklin County, Deputy Sheriff Correctional Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Smith v. Sheriff, Hamilton County et al
as 1:2008cv00234
Plaintiff:
Curtis Smith, Curtis Smith and Curtis Smith
Defendant:
Sheriff, Hamilton County, Eric Copenhaver, Hamilton County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
