Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Percy et al v. S & E Azrlliant P C et al
as 1:2021cv02313
Defendant:
S & E Azrlliant P C, Stealth Contracting Inc, Soil Mechanics Drilling Corp and others
Plaintiff:
Albert E. Percy and Percy Jobs and Careers Corporation an IRC 501(c)(3) non-profit, as Class Representatives, Albert E. Percy and Percy Jobs and Careers Corporation
Respondent:
James M. Kernan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv06199
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ed
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01967
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ed
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv05733
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2e Job Discrimination (Unlawful Employment Practices)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv05490
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Wooten v. St. Lukes Roosevelt Hospital C
as 11-3330
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James R. Wooten
Defendant - Appellee:
St. Lukes Roosevelt Hospital Center, Louis Schenkel, Norman Werner and others
Wooten v. St. Lukes Roosevelt Hospital Center et al
as 1:2011cv04332
Plaintiff:
James R. Wooten
Defendant:
St. Lukes Roosevelt Hospital Center, Louis Schenkel, Norman Werner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02277
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00012
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00108
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
