Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Jones v. City of Alexandria, Louisiana et al
as 1:2023cv00996
Plaintiff:
Kendavius Jamar Jones
Defendant:
City of Alexandria, Stephen Bankston, Jim Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00812
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Doe v. The City of Baton Rouge et al
as 3:2020cv00514
Defendant:
Christopher Nakamoto, Shanard Carey, East Baton Rouge Parish and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amin v. St. Tammany Parish School Board et al
as 2:2019cv13539
Defendant:
Occupational Therapi Kristen Zemmer, Superintendent William Folse, III, Social Worker Carliss Aguillard and others
Plaintiff:
Kieyokie Amin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv10785
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Stokes v. Faber et al
as 2:2019cv01642
Defendant:
Brandon Williams, Valerie Johnson, Billy Matranga and others
Plaintiff:
Crystal Stokes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Doe v. City of Baton Rouge, et al
as 3:2019cv00048
Defendant:
Pat Magee, East Baton Rouge Parish, S Carey and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Stokes et al
as 3:2018cv00363
Defendant:
Unknown Bolden, Unknown Bolton, Unknown Foster and others
Plaintiff:
John Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
D'Aquin v. Norris et al
as 2:2015cv00761
Plaintiff:
Thomas L D'Aquin
Defendant:
John Fahrman , Catherine Kahrs, Brett Stoltz and others
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Daniel v. Seuzeneau et al
as 2:2015cv00312
Plaintiff:
Brendan A. Daniel
Defendant:
Daniel Seuzeneau, Chad Olivier, Justin Stokes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
