Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Gilot v. UR Medicine Strong Memorial Hospital et al
as 6:2023cv06078
Plaintiff:
Farrah Gilot
Defendant:
UR Medicine Strong Memorial Hospital, UR Medicine Strong Nurse, UR Medicine Strong Memorial Nurse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv06574
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Crowley v. Strong Memorial Hospital of The University of Rochester et al
as 1:2021cv01078
Plaintiff:
Jordan Crowley
Defendant:
STRONG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER, Kaleida Health and UBMD PHYSICIANS GROUP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv06575
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Miller v. Eisenhauer et al
as 6:2019cv06854
Plaintiff:
Timothy Miller
Defendant:
Strong Memorial Hospital, Joshua Gingrich, Carrie Eisenhauer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Koul v. University of Rochester
as 18-521
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Suneel Koul
Defendant - Appellee:
University of Rochester and Strong Memorial Hospital
Defendant:
John Doe and Jane Doe
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-1952
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Koul v. University of Rochester et al
as 6:2014cv06428
Defendant:
University of Rochester and Strong Memorial Hospital
Plaintiff:
Suneel Koul
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv06482
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv06290
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
