Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Tate v. O'Malley
as 1:2023cv16421
Plaintiff:
Laurie Tate
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration and Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02136
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Carrasquillo v. Young et al
as 1:2022cv06272
Plaintiff:
Michael Carrasquillo
Defendant:
Timothy Young, Antonio Piscopo, Jeffrey Tate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cooper et al v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2022cv05761
Plaintiff:
Tracy Cooper and Erica Goree
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Ronald Watts, Rebecca Bogard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Hansen et al
as 1:2022cv00599
Plaintiff:
Delicia Williams
Defendant:
Trooper Randal Hansen, Special Agent Robert Tate, Special Agent Troy Black and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Krueger et al v. Petrak et al
as 1:2022cv01016
Plaintiff:
Jacob Krueger and Patricia Krueger
Defendant:
Channing Petrak, OSF St. Francis Medical Center, Jennifer Inness and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv50317
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams Jr v. The City of Aurora et al
as 1:2021cv03489
Defendant:
The City of Aurora, Kirsten Ziman and Jeff Tate
Plaintiff:
Andy Hope Williams Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carrasquillo v. Young et al
as 1:2021cv02156
Defendant:
City of Aurora, IL, Timothy Young, Jeffrey Tate and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Carrasquillo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. City of Chicago
as 1:2020cv07688
Plaintiff:
Kim Woods, Mia Wright, Tnika Tate and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
