Cases 1 - 10 of 95
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr Notice of Removal
Deaton et al v. Breathitt County Fiscal Court et al
as 5:2023cv00347
Plaintiff:
Crystal Deaton, Calvin Saum, II and Kenneth Watts
Defendant:
Breathitt County Fiscal Court, Jeffery Noble, Brenda Fugate Terry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Price v. Muhlenberg County, Kentucky et al
as 4:2023cv00121
Plaintiff:
Keith Price
Defendant:
Muhlenberg County, Kentucky and Terry Nunley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00516
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Edwards v. KY Family Court et al
as 6:2023cv00097
Plaintiff:
Garry Dewayne Edwards
Defendant:
KY Family Court, Jane Venters, Kent Hendrickson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Edwards v. KY Family Court et al
as 3:2023cv00249
Plaintiff:
Garry Dewayne Edwards
Defendant:
KY Family Court, Jane Venters, Kent Hendrickson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00658
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 er Removal- Employment Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00032
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00143
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
