Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00308
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bugman, Jr. v. The City of Tonawanda, New York et al
as 1:2021cv00313
Defendant:
Kyle Gallivan, Jane/John Doe(s) Individually and in his/her capacity as an employee for The Hertz Corporation d/b/a Dollar Rent-A Car, Nathan Schultz and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Bugman, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
O'Diah v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 1:2016cv01373
Defendant:
American Medical College Application Service, And Association Of American Medical Colleges, And Medical College Admission Test, Anthony J. Annucci, Beckman Coulter, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Aror Ark O'Diah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv03110
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
O'Diah v. Commissioners and Police of The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey et al
as 1:2014cv03001
Plaintiff:
Aror Ark O'Diah
Defendant:
Commissioners and Police of The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, City of New York, Nassau County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bravo v. Bexar County, TX et al
as 1:2012cv04009
Defendant:
Bexar County, TX, District Attorney's Office of Bexar County, TX, Hertz Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Louis A. Bravo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv01634
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
