Cases 1 - 10 of 226
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv08832
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
WASHINGTON v. THE CITY OF JERSEY CITY et al
as 2:2024cv08597
Defendant:
OFFICER CHRISTIAN E. ORTIZ, CAPTAIN JASON E. FIELD, EMT HUNTER JACKMAN and others
Plaintiff:
COURTNIE WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
APPELGREN v. BERGEN NEWBRIDGE MEDICAL CENTER et al
as 2:2024cv08030
Defendant:
BERGEN NEWBRIDGE MEDICAL CENTER and SECURITY GUARDS JOHN DOES 1-10
Plaintiff:
MARK APPELGREN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv07971
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv07972
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
APPELGREN v. INTERN DOCTOR et al
as 2:2024cv08011
Defendant:
INTERN DOCTOR and BERGEN NEWBRIDGE MEDICAL CENTER
Plaintiff:
MARK APPELGREN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DODSON v. COOPERMAN BARNABAS MEDICAL CENTER
as 2:2024cv07920
Plaintiff:
KEVIN DODSON
Defendant:
COOPERMAN BARNABAS MEDICAL CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CHEY v. MOUNT ARLINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2024cv07788
Defendant:
RONNY ROSARIO, PISETH CHEY, MATTHEW TUMULTY and others
Plaintiff:
TIFFANY CHEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv06946
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06394
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
