Cases 1 - 10 of 16
WASHINGTON v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY
as 1:2024cv04826
Plaintiff:
TERRELL CLARENCE WASHINGTON
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WASHINGTON v. WERTZBERGER et al
as 1:2023cv21566
Plaintiff:
TERRELL CLARENCE WASHINGTON
Defendant:
JASON WERTZBERGER, JEFFREY SUTHERLAND, CAPE MAY COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01152
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
MICKLES v. SOCIAL COUNTRIES
as 1:2022cv03820
Plaintiff:
TERRELL MICKLES
Defendant:
SOCIAL COUNTRIES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FINLEY v. PASSAIC COUNTY et al
as 2:2021cv13831
Plaintiff:
TERRELL FINLEY
Defendant:
PASSAIC COUNTY, OFFICE OF THE PASSAIC COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, PASSAIC COUNTY JAIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BERFET v. BARAKA et al
as 2:2020cv14138
Defendant:
SALIMA TAYLOR and RAS J. BARAKA
Plaintiff:
TERRELL BERFET
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PIERCE v. BOROUGH OF PENNS GROVE et al
as 1:2020cv01656
Defendant:
PATRICK RILEY, TOWNSHIP OF CARNEYS POINT, JOHN DOES 26-50 and others
Plaintiff:
TERRELL PIERCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. CFG HEALTH SYSTEMS LLC et al
as 1:2016cv08980
Plaintiff:
TERRELL WILLIAMS
Defendant:
CFG HEALTH SYSTEMS LLC, COUNTY OF CAMDEN, CAMDEN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SHAH v. THE CITY OF ROSELLE PARK et al
as 2:2015cv03510
Plaintiff:
RAVI SHAH
Defendant:
THE CITY OF ROSELLE PARK, ROSELLE PARK POLICE DEPARTMENT, TERRELL MCGRIFF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. PIVNICHNY et al
as 1:2015cv03368
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
TIMOTHY PIVNICHNY, BARACK OBAMA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
