Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Vowels v. USPS OIG et al
as 3:2024cv00294
Plaintiff:
Lesley Vowels
Defendant:
USPS OIG, The State of Kentucky: Kentucky Secretary of State, KY Western District and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 fr Fed. Question: Fraud
Lillacalenia v. State of Kentucky
as 3:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
Dahved Malik Lillacalenia
Defendant:
State of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Vowels v. State of Kentucky et al
as 3:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Lesley Vowels
Defendant:
State of Kentucky, Gene Snyder Federal Building, United States District Court West and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lawrence v. Wilson et al
as 1:2022cv00136
Plaintiff:
Marcus J. Lawrence, Sr. and LAW
Defendant:
Steve A. Wilson, The County of Warren, The Commonwealth of Kentucky and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 015
Dawan v. State of Kentucky
as 3:2022cv00044
Plaintiff:
Yusuf Mujahid Dawan
Defendant:
State of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ward et al v. Henson et al
as 3:2020cv00468
Defendant:
Jan Yonts, Bill Henson, City of Greenville and others
Plaintiff:
J. E., Jannetta Kay Ward and Jeffery Glen Ward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Reid v. State of Kentucky et al
as 3:2019cv00800
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Reid
Defendant:
Kathy Johnson, Michael B. Keene, State of Kentucky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawrence v. United States District Court et al
as 3:2016cv00131
Plaintiff:
Marcus J. Lawrence, SR
Defendant:
United States District Court, Greg N. Stivers, Thomas B. Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nunn v. State of Kentucky
as 3:2015cv00031
Petitioner:
Roderick Nunn
Respondent:
State of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howell v. State of Kentucky
as 3:2014cv00202
Plaintiff:
Fredderick Howell
Defendant:
State of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
