Cases 1 - 10 of 160
Reinhardt v. State of Oregon et al
as 2:2024cv01220
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Warren Roberts, Does 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Reinhardt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01098
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Moore v. Irish et al
as 1:2024cv00844
Plaintiff:
Daren J. Moore
Defendant:
Thomas Andreazzi, Robert Fenner, Julie Almand and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Marquart v. City of Shaniko et al
as 3:2024cv00236
Plaintiff:
Zachary Forrest Marquart
Defendant:
City of Shaniko, David R. Long, Diana L. Marrs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Reed v. Eugene School District 4J et al
as 6:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Reed
Defendant:
Eugene School District 4J, Paula McCown, Jonathan Andrew Dey, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv01806
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Discrimination Based on Sex or Blindness
Yarn v. Bogen et al
as 3:2023cv01771
Plaintiff:
Donnie Yard and Donnie Yarn
Defendant:
Ethan Bogen, Marc Rodriguez, Carey Caldwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hasty v. US Forest Service et al
as 6:2023cv01590
Plaintiff:
Barry Hasty
Defendant:
US Forest Service and Thomas J. Vilsack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv01486
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01438
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
