Cases 1 - 10 of 108
74-00078 MAPLE AVENUE, LLC v. TOWNSHIP OF PLUMSTED et al
as 3:2024cv06639
Plaintiff:
74-78 MAPLE AVENUE, LLC
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF PLUMSTED and TOWNSHIP OF PLUMSTED LAND USE BOARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
74-78 MAPLE AVENUE, LLC v. TOWNSHIP OF PLUMSTED et al
as 3:2024cv06626
Plaintiff:
74-78 MAPLE AVENUE, LLC
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF PLUMSTED and TOWNSHIP OF PLUMSTED LAND USE BOARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05963
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05890
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05341
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv04517
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04475
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00492
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv23406
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
FAHNBULLEH v. T-MOBILE US, INC.
as 1:2023cv21590
Petitioner:
RAYMOND FAHNBULLEH
Respondent:
T-MOBILE US, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
