Cases 1 - 10 of 107
Denham v. United States Government et al
as 3:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
Cos O. Denham
Defendant:
United States Government and City of Union, MS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Denham v. United States Government et al
as 3:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
Cos O. Denham
Defendant:
United States Government and Mississippi Department of Human Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00310
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Reyes v. The United States Department of Justice et al
as 3:2022cv00406
Plaintiff:
Gay Lynn Reyes
Defendant:
The United States Department of Justice, The State of Alabama, The State of Mississippi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Guinn v. United States of America
as 5:2022cv00038
Plaintiff:
Terrance Guinn
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Hall v. United States et al
as 4:2021cv00173
Plaintiff:
Arizona Hall, Jr.
Defendant:
United States, John Does, Phil Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00599
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States of America v. Ruredy808, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00192
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Ruredy808, LLC and Frank Savage
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Robert Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Bey v. United States of America et al
as 3:2021cv00167
Defendant:
Meg Bartlett, State of Mississippi, U. S. Marshals and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Amum'Ra Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00045
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
