Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-13621
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Capurso v. Bank & Banking
as 12-2192
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Victor Frederick Leo Capurso
Defendant:
Wall Street, New York, The U.S. Stock Market & Land Use, Areas, & unauthorized, Land use, areas & disclosures, re: district, newspaper, 10/14/2011, 8/5/2011, &wall street journal the wall street journal & the new york almanac, the almanac of record, wall , Carleon Corporate Mercers or Acquisitions in United States, Post 1950, Since 1995 to current see the World Almanac and Book of Facts Year 2003, Pg 121, Eastern, States, Bank &Banking, Credit Card Association, Credit Cards, Rare, Laws, Regulations & Rules, in current & recent, , for past 1900 of, for 2000 of, since past 1900 of, since 1900 of, all named of and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Washington Munial, Seattle, Washington, doing business in State of New York & in State of California in a being aquired by JP Morgan Chase Bank, since 2001, Congress of the United States, Capital One Bank (USA), N.A., doing business in States, New York, North Carolina, Virginia, & Utah, & Elsewhere, credit card purchases, interest rate, & minimum, payment, increase as of 11/20/2011 and others
Capurso v. Bank & Banking et al
as 1:2012cv02698
Plaintiff:
Victor Frederick Leo Capurso
Defendant:
Bank & Banking, U.S., Corporations, Offering Products & Services, to consumers, at all named of Banks & Holding, Companies, Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wesley v. United States District Court Southern District of Florida
as 1:2011cv24166
Plaintiff:
Pedro James Wesley
Defendant:
United States District Court Southern District of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Pedro Wesley v. United States District Court S
as 11-10756
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PEDRO J. WESLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
