Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Antar v. Grogins et al
as 3:2024cv00264
Plaintiff:
Theodora F. Antar
Defendant:
Auden Grogins, Scott Jones, Jane Grossman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Germain v. U.S. Bank National Association et al
as 3:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Henley V. Germain
Defendant:
U.S. National Bank Association, Sawarn Singh, Gerald M. Still and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01337
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. United States
as 3:2023cv01198
Plaintiff:
Dyane V. Smith
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Venue
Guan v. O'Grady et al
as 3:2023cv00847
Plaintiff:
Alice Guan
Defendant:
Liam O'Grady, Jen Kim, James C. Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Guan v. O'Grady et al
as 3:2023cv00398
Plaintiff:
Alice Guan
Defendant:
Liam O'Grady, Jen Kim, James C. Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nkrumah et al v. State of Connecticut et al
as 3:2023cv00302
Plaintiff:
Kwame Nkrumah, Shannon Nkrumah, Lula Woodson and others
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, City of New Haven, New Haven Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Nkrumah et al v. Connecticut et al
as 3:2022cv00866
Plaintiff:
Kwame Nkrumah, Shannon Nkrumah, Lula Woodson and others
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, City of New Haven, Justin Elicker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
