Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Victor v. Lafayette Consolidated Government et al
as 6:2024cv00560
Plaintiff:
Antoine Victor
Defendant:
Lafayette Consolidated Government, John Doe and X Y Z Insurance Co
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mireles v. Duplantier
as 6:2022cv05975
Plaintiff:
Joseph Victor Van Brocklin Mireles
Defendant:
Thomas Duplantier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clervrain et al v. Johnson et al
as 3:2022cv00244
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain, Alex Felix, Jhims Francois and others
Defendant:
Tae D. Johnson, Patrick J. Lechleitner, Ava Cates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Green et al v. City of Monroe et al
as 3:2022cv00884
Plaintiff:
David Green, LaDaizya Tillman, Dakedra Jones and others
Defendant:
City of Monroe, Friday Ellis, City Council of Monroe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Johnson et al v. Monroe et al
as 3:2022cv00828
Defendant:
Oliver Ellis, City of Monroe, Friday Ellis and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Johnson and Mallory Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Brown et al v. Monroe et al
as 3:2022cv00787
Plaintiff:
Reginald Brown and Latoya Brown
Defendant:
City of Monroe, Oliver Ellis, Eugene Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jackson v. Zordan et al
as 3:2021cv03017
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Jackson
Defendant:
Victor Zordan, Timothy Crum, Timothy Antley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Dunn v. Fontenot et al
as 6:2021cv01535
Defendant:
John Doe, Randy Fontenot, City of Eunice and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Dunn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Zordan et al
as 3:2021cv01061
Defendant:
Eugene Ellis, City of Monroe, Victor Zordan and others
Petitioner:
Mr. Timothy Wayne Williams
Plaintiff:
Timothy Wayne Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
