Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00692
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00903
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Carter v. Vandikan et al
as 2:2014cv02342
Plaintiff:
Anna M. Vines Carter
Defendant:
Scott Vandikan, Tacky, Slar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carter v. OSU Harding Hospital et al
as 2:2014cv02345
Plaintiff:
Anna M. Vines Carter
Defendant:
OSU Harding Hospital, Slanders, Cunnham and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carter v. Clerk of Court of Columbus Franklin et al
as 2:2014cv02344
Plaintiff:
Anna M. Vines Carter
Defendant:
Clerk of Court of Columbus Franklin, Wealthy History, Doctor West and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carter v. Grant Hospital et al
as 2:2014cv02343
Plaintiff:
Anna M. Vines Carter
Defendant:
Grant Hospital, Sander, Slader and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carter v. Life of the South et al
as 2:2013cv00301
Plaintiff:
Cardional Anna Vines Carter
Defendant:
Life of the South, Protective Life, Bankers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carter v. City of Columbus et al
as 2:2013cv00039
Plaintiff:
Cardional Anna Vines Carter
Defendant:
City of Columbus, Ohio Ethics Commission and Searia Geffens Malone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Carter v. Riverside Methodist Hospital et al
as 2:2012cv01152
Plaintiff:
Cardional Anna Vines Carter
Defendant:
Riverside Methodist Hospital and Carner, Taps, Security of Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carter v. Mt. Carmel Hosp ICU-CCU et al
as 2:2012cv00928
Plaintiff:
Cardional Anna Vines Carter
Defendant:
Mt. Carmel Hosp ICU-CCU, Mary, Maggie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
