Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv01574
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00945
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Standley v. Nelms et al
as 3:2022cv00275
Plaintiff:
Chad Standley
Defendant:
Vicki Nelms, Greg Neuman and North Clackamas SD 12
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Walker v. United States Department of Agriculture et al
as 1:2021cv00126
Defendant:
Jay DeLapp, United States Department of Agriculture, Vicki L. Walker and others
Plaintiff:
Angie Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia et al v. City of Seaside et al
as 3:2020cv00032
Defendant:
T D & M Enterprises, Inc., William Barnes, City of Seaside and others
Plaintiff:
Linette Moncayo, Carmen Garcia and Carmen C. Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01849
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Graves et al v. City of Eagle Point et al
as 1:2018cv02093
Defendant:
City of Eagle Point, Daniel Cardenas and Eagle Point Police Department
Plaintiff:
Vicki Graves and Michael Graves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weaver v. City of Elgin et al
as 2:2016cv00682
Defendant:
City of Elgin and Brock Eckstein
Plaintiff:
Vicki Weaver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tanner v. Hightower et al
as 6:2014cv01035
Defendant:
Does 1 through 10, Vicki Hightower, Riverside County of California and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel J. Tanner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2014cv00005
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
