Civil Rights Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 1 - 10 of 14
CATERBONE v. LANCASTER CITY BUREAU OF POLICE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2018cv02710
Defendant: MIKE GEESEY, ABIGAL PFLUMM, ASHLEY BLAKE and others
Plaintiff: STANLEY J. CATERBONE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv03128
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv05548
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv05221
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv01643
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
HATCHER et al v. SN SERVICING CORP et al
as 2:2010cv02253
Plaintiff: BERNADETTE HATCHER and ANTHONY STEGALL
Defendant: SN SERVICING CORP, WACHOVIA BANK and WELLS FARGO BANK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv04180
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv02592
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv02136
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Type: Civil Rights None
BOYD v. WACHOVIA BANK, N.A. et al
as 2:2008cv03178
Plaintiff: JOANNE BOYD
Defendant: WACHOVIA BANK, N.A. and THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA ORPHANS' COURT
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Civil Rights None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?