Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
ECBI WARNER LLC et al v. TOMS et al
as 5:2021cv00148
Defendant:
CLIFFORD HOLMES, KEVIN LASHLEY, THOMAS RANDALL TOMS and others
Plaintiff:
ANTWON ALSOBROOK, eCBI Warner, LLC, JERRALD RECTOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
WODA COOPER DEVELOPMENT INC et al v. CITY OF WARNER ROBINS GEORGIA et al
as 5:2020cv00159
Plaintiff:
PARALLEL PERKINS FIELD DEVELOPMENT LLC, WODA COOPER DEVELOPMENT INC, PARALLEL HOUSING INC and others
Defendant:
THE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF WARNER ROBINS, CITY OF WARNER ROBINS GEORGIA and MAYOR RANDY TOMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
JOHNSON v. ADRIANCE et al
as 5:2019cv00414
Plaintiff:
ADRIANNE JOHNSON
Defendant:
DAVID JACOB ADRIANCE and CITY OF WARNER ROBINS GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00319
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00194
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HILDEBRAND v. CITY OF WARNER ROBINS POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 5:2017cv00313
Defendant:
CITY OF WARNER ROBINS GEORGIA , RANDY TOMS , TIM THOMAS and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN JOSEPH HILDEBRAND, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GARY v. WARNER ROBINS GEORGIA
as 5:2016cv00151
Plaintiff:
BARBARA GARY
Defendant:
WARNER ROBINS GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
CHRISTENSEN v. WARNER ROBINS GEORGIA
as 5:2016cv00076
Plaintiff:
JEREMY CHRISTENSEN
Defendant:
WARNER ROBINS GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2617
MUSSELWHITE v. WARNER ROBINS GEORGIA et al
as 5:2015cv00449
Plaintiff:
JOE D MUSSELWHITE
Defendant:
WARNER ROBINS GEORGIA , RANDY TOMS , TIM THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
