Cases 1 - 10 of 24
KINCH v. CAULFIELD et al
as 2:2023cv02076
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MAURICE KINCH
Defendant:
REGINA CAULFIELD, JUAN SMITH, ANTONIO LACOSTA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MCDOWELL et al v. GREWAL et al
as 3:2020cv00433
Defendant:
CAMELIA M. VALDES, JOHN T. LENAHAN, JEFFREY H SUTHERLAND and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES DOUGLAS MCDOWELL and THOMAS LEO MULLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WEBB v. STATE OF GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, DIVISION OF CHILD SUPPORT SERVICES et al
as 1:2019cv13975
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, DIVISION OF FAMILY DEVELOPMENT and STATE OF GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, DIVISION OF CHILD SUPPORT SERVICES
Plaintiff:
GREGORY WEBB
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DESSOURCES v. MANNING et al
as 2:2018cv09324
Plaintiff:
LOUIS D DESSOURCES
Defendant:
DENNIS MANNING, MR. WEBB, (JANE DOE 5,6,7 and JOHN DOES 2,3,4,5) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DESSOURCES v. MANNING et al
as 2:2018cv09247
Plaintiff:
LOUIS DESSOURCES
Defendant:
DENNIS MANNING, MISTER WEBB, JANE DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv07030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
BURRUS v. ELMER et al
as 1:2017cv02664
Plaintiff:
EFREM BURRUS
Defendant:
ELMER and MELVIN WEBB
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01612
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00390
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAGUDA v. CITY OF RAHWAY et al
as 2:2015cv03299
Plaintiff:
YAKUB LAGUDA
Defendant:
CITY OF RAHWAY, CITY OF RAHWAY POLICE DEPARTMENT, JACKMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
