Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00771
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00743
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00975
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv02784
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
McKinney v. City of Selmer, Tennessee et al
as 1:2012cv01101
Plaintiff:
James D. McKinney
Defendant:
City of Selmer, Tennessee , McNairy County, Tennessee , City of Selmer Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gray v. Haddox et al
as 1:2010cv00065
Plaintiff:
Luther E. Gray
Defendant:
Patsy Haddox and Bruce Westbrooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nesbitt v. City of Milan, Tennessee et al
as 1:2008cv01313
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Nesbitt
Defendant:
City of Milan, Tennessee, Jason Krause, Clayton Westbrooks and others
Miscellaneou:
Janice Jones
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ewing v. Little et al
as 2:2007cv02783
Plaintiff:
Andrew Ray Ewing
Defendant:
George Little, Kenneth W. Locke, Tennessee Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv02657
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv02583
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
