Cases 1 - 10 of 140
EMRIT v. PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN et al
as 2:2024cv04702
Plaintiff:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant:
PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN, HUNTER BIDEN, UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DODSON v. FREJUSTE et al
as 2:2024cv01217
Plaintiff:
KEVIN DODSON
Defendant:
ROMAIN FREJUSTE, CITY OF NEWARK, CITY HALL OF NEWARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00240
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv21741
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv13982
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
LIN-HENDEL et al v. DUPUIS et al
as 3:2023cv03956
Petitioner:
DR. CATHERINE G. LIN-HENDEL, PH.D. and DR. RUDOLF H. HENDEL, PH.D.
Respondent:
KATHERINE DUPIS, KAREN M. CASSIDY, THOMAS J. WALSH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
DODSON v. KING et al
as 3:2023cv03344
Defendant:
RAY KING, EVA L. KING, ANGELA WHITE DALTON and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN DODSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alintoff et al v. State Of New Jersey et al
as 3:2023cv02671
Plaintiff:
RACHEL ALINTOFF
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE COURTS, CARMEN DIAZ-PETTI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02597
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02597
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
