Cases 1 - 10 of 740
BRYCELAND v. GUT
as 2:2024cv06863
Plaintiff:
MARTA BRYCELAND
Defendant:
THOMAS GUT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv06619
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
MARCHISOTTO v. SANCHEZ et al
as 1:2024cv05870
Plaintiff:
JOHN F. MARCHISOTTO
Defendant:
JUDGE JUAN R. SANCHEZ, KENT A. JORDAN, MICHAEL A. CHAGARES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
VERGARA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2024cv05555
Defendant:
REGINA INEZ PEOPLES, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MERRICK B. GARLAND and others
Plaintiff:
LUIS EDUARDO VERGARA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GAGE v. BOROUGH OF NEW PROVIDENCE et al
as 2:2024cv05544
Plaintiff:
THOMAS I GAGE
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF NEW PROVIDENCE, KEITH J. LYNCH and WILLIAM F. WALDRON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
EMRIT v. ROBERTS et al
as 3:2024cv04653
Plaintiff:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant:
CHIEF JUSTICE JOHN ROBERTS, JUSTICE BRETT KAVANAUGH, JUSTICE SAMUEL ALITO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02656
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
THOMAS v. CNN et al
as 3:2024cv01044
Plaintiff:
FRED THOMAS, JR.
Defendant:
CNN, M.S.N.B.C., THE VIEW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
THOMAS JR. v. BUMB et al
as 3:2024cv01046
Plaintiff:
FRED THOMAS JR.
Defendant:
CHIEF JUDGE RENEE M. BUMB, MAGISTRATE JUDGE SHARON A. KING and MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH A. PASCAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00756
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
