Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Karns v. Bonawits et al
as 3:2021cv01564
Plaintiff:
Chirstlynn Karns
Defendant:
Officer Matthew Alan Bonawits, Sgt. Jason Height, Officer John Bevilaqua and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Kingston Municipal Police Department et al
as 3:2021cv01563
Defendant:
Sgt. Jason Height, Kingston Municipal Police Department, Kingston Borough and others
Plaintiff:
Musa Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MILLER v. FREDERIC I. WEINBERG AND ASSOCIATES, P.C. et al
as 5:2017cv03856
Plaintiff:
DEBRA MILLER
Defendant:
FREDERIC I. WEINBERG AND ASSOCIATES, P.C., JOHN DOES 1-10 and X,Y,Z CORPORATIONS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
JOHNSON v. SIMM ASSOCIATES, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv00604
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINA P. JOHNSON
Defendant:
SIMM ASSOCIATES, INC., X,Y,Z CORPORATIONS and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
JOHNSON v. TRANSWORLD SYSTEMS, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv00603
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINA P. JOHNSON
Defendant:
TRANSWORLD SYSTEMS, INC., X,Y,Z CORPORATION and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
CHONG v. EQUIFAX WORKFORCE SOLUTIONS et al
as 2:2016cv05666
Plaintiff:
KARLA CHONG
Defendant:
EQUIFAX WORKFORCE SOLUTIONS and X,Y,Z CORPORATIONS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
JOHNSON v. ABRAHAMSEN RATCHFORD, P.C. et al
as 2:2016cv05309
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINA P. JOHNSON
Defendant:
ABRAHAMSEN RATCHFORD, P.C., X,Y,Z CORPORATIONS and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
DEWDNEY v. TABAS AND ROSEN, P.C. et al
as 2:2016cv02865
Plaintiff:
W. DEWDNEY
Defendant:
TABAS AND ROSEN, P.C., X,Y,Z CORPORATIONS and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
FALLON v. COMMERCIAL ACCEPTANCE COMPANY
as 2:2014cv03971
Plaintiff:
ROSEMARY FALLON
Defendant:
COMMERCIAL ACCEPTANCE COMPANY and X,Y,Z CORPORATIONS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Devlin v. Remit Corporation et al
as 4:2014cv00657
Plaintiff:
April E. Devlin
Defendant:
Remit Corporation and X,Y, Z Corporations
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
