Cases 1 - 10 of 53
MOJKA KAZANCHY et al v. TOWNSHIP OF RANDOLPH et al
as 2:2024cv04115
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY MOJKA KAZANCHY and BRIAN KAZANCHY
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF RANDOLPH, GREG POFF, DARREN CARNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv16761
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
OUAZIZ v. MODDY et al
as 2:2023cv00046
Plaintiff:
BOUAZZA OUAZIZ
Defendant:
TAWANA MODDY, WILLIAM OLSZEWSKI, SERGEANT DARREN SORRENTINO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
OUAZIZ v. CITY OF JERSEY et al
as 2:2022cv04546
Plaintiff:
BOUAZZA OUAZIZ
Defendant:
CITY OF JERSEY, TAWANA MODDY, CHIEF OF JERSEY CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DEJESUS v. DIVISION NEW JERSEY CIVIL RIGHTS et al
as 2:2021cv18413
Plaintiff:
ALEX DEJESUS
Defendant:
DIVISION NEW JERSEY CIVIL RIGHTS, ELIZABETH M RUSSIAW, WALESKA LUCAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JAMES v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2021cv16769
Plaintiff:
DR. DARREN JAMES
Defendant:
THE SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, JUDGE GLENN GRANT, JUDGE THORNTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv12614
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
KAPLON v. MORRIS TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2020cv20559
Defendant:
MADISON POLICE DEPARTMENT, DARREN P. DACHISEN, BOROUGH OF MADISON and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL KAPLON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
CHEN v. KPMG LLP et al
as 2:2020cv09314
Defendant:
CLAUDIA SARAN, KPMG LLP, CLIFF JUSTICE and others
Plaintiff:
AIDONG CHEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv09253
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
