Cases 1 - 10 of 32
MILLER v. GEORGIA PUBLIC DEFENDER STANDARDS COUNCIL, et al
as 4:2023cv00151
Plaintiff:
NANCY B MILLER
Defendant:
GEORGIA PUBLIC DEFENDER STANDARDS COUNCIL, OMOTAYO B ALLI, MOFFETT FLOURNOY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
WEBB v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 5:2022cv00255
Plaintiff:
DAVID Q WEBB
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA, TRACY JANE MULLIS, BRADFORD LEE RIGBY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02387
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Webb v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2022cv02129
Plaintiff:
David Q. Webb
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Attorney Tracy Jane Mulllis, Attorney Bradford Lee Rigby and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Thomas v. Kemp et al
as 1:2022cv01372
Plaintiff:
Albert Charles Thomas
Defendant:
Brian Kemp, Deborah Gonzalez, John W. Donnelly and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00145
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
MILLER v. ALLI et al
as 4:2021cv00129
Plaintiff:
NANCY B MILLER
Defendant:
OMOTAYO B ALLI, MOFFETT FLOURNOY, CHATTAHOOCHEE CIRCUIT PUBLIC DEFENDER'S OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00083
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794
Richardson v. The State of Georgia et al
as 1:2020cv00519
Defendant:
The Office of The Public Defender, Atlanta Judicial Circuit, Vernon Pitts, Lieutenant Dan Cochran and others
Plaintiff:
Christine Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv05609
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
