Cases 91 - 100 of 235
Baird v. Ritter et al
as 1:2010cv00516
Plaintiff:
Randolph Stephen Baird
Defendant:
Bill (I) Ritter, Bill Ritter, Colorado Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Braxton, et al v. Zavaras, et al
as 10-1053
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ALLEN BRAXTON, TROY GRAVES, RONALD JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DAVID JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
ARISTEDES ZAVARAS, the Executive Director of the C.D.O.C., KEVIN MILYARD, TERRY BARTRUFF and others
Lynch v. Heil et al
as 1:2010cv00398
Plaintiff:
Andre L. Lynch
Defendant:
Peggy (I) Heil, Peggy Heil, Bill (I) Zalman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barraza v. Anding et al
as 1:2010cv00159
Plaintiff:
Deneen L. Barraza
Defendant:
Anding, Maine and Aristedes Zavaras
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blair v. Zavaras et al
as 1:2010cv00161
Plaintiff:
Jerry Blair
Defendant:
Aristedes Zavaras and George Dunbar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maddox v. Frantz et al
as 1:2009cv02969
Plaintiff:
Harold Thomas Maddox
Defendant:
Paula (I) Frantz, Paula Frantz, Aristedes (I) Zavaras and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alexander v. Zavaras
as 1:2009cv02826
Petitioner:
Clay Alexander
Respondent:
Aristedes Zavaras
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rueb v. Zavaras et al
as 1:2009cv02817
Plaintiff:
Justin Joseph Rueb
Defendant:
Aristedes Zavaras and Susan Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitington v. Lawson, et al
as 09-1504
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL WHITINGTON
Defendant - Appellee:
DONALD LAWSON, AL ESTEP, SGT. HARDING and others
Tuller v. Zavaras et al
as 1:2009cv02556
Plaintiff:
Steven Michael Tuller
Defendant:
Aristedes Zavaras, Larry Ried, Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
