Cases 91 - 100 of 219
Howell v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice
as 7:2015cv00241
Plaintiff:
Kent Lee Howell
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramos v. Farrell et al
as 6:2015cv00820
Plaintiff:
Ramon Ramos
Defendant:
Trentin D Farrell, Cathy Ferguson, Jeffery D Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. State of Texas
as 4:2015cv00529
Petitioner:
Kent Altonio Rogers
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Springer v. Willis
as 3:2015cv00191
Notice Only Party:
Magdalena Jara
Petitioner:
Lindsey Kent Springer
Respondent:
J.S. Willis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mayfield v. UTMB Medical Department et al
as 9:2015cv00092
Plaintiff:
Larry M Mayfield
Defendant:
UTMB Medical Department, Kent Dickerson, Janice Hanson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayfield v. UTMB Medical Department et al
as 6:2015cv00516
Plaintiff:
Larry M Mayfield
Defendant:
UTMB Medical Department, Kent Dickerson, Janice Hanson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayfield v. Dental Department et al
as 9:2015cv00090
Plaintiff:
Larry M Mayfield
Defendant:
Dental Department, Administrative Segregation Security, Kent Dickerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayfield v. Medical Department et al
as 6:2015cv00513
Plaintiff:
Larry M Mayfield
Defendant:
Medical Department, Administrative Segregation Security, Kent Dickerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayfield v. Dickerson et al
as 9:2015cv00083
Plaintiff:
Larry M Mayfield
Defendant:
Kent Dickerson, Thomas Donohue, Janice L Hanson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayfield v. Dental Department et al
as 6:2015cv00522
Plaintiff:
Larry M Mayfield
Defendant:
Dental Department, Administrative Segregation Security, Kent Dickerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
