Cases 91 - 100 of 125
GEIGER v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA et al
as 1:2009cv00982
Plaintiff:
RONALD EARL GEIGER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, CHRISTINA A. SNYDER, ROSALYN M. CHAPMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Otis Jordan v. Frank Shaw
as 09-2189
Petitioner - Appellant:
OTIS JORDAN
Respondent - Appellee:
FRANK L. SHAW
Tony Shoultz v. Anthony Ramos
as 09-2125
Petitioner - Appellant:
TONY SHOULTZ
Respondent - Appellee:
FRANK L. SHAW and ANTHONY RAMOS
Willie Norwood v. Frank Shaw
as 09-2035
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIE NORWOOD
Respondent - Appellee:
FRANK L. SHAW
Carl Williams v. Doctor Ravanam, et al
as 09-2018
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARL E. WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
DOCTOR RAVANAM, FRANK L. SHAW, DOCTOR RANKIN and others
Felix Torres, II v. US Ninth Circuit Court of Appe, et al
as 09-55549
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FELIX TORRES, II
Defendant:
US NINTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS, THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON RULES OF PRACTICE AND INTERNAL OPERATING PROCEDURES OF THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT and PETER L. SHAW, Appellate Commissioner individually and in his official capacity
Byia Bruce v. Frank Shaw
as 09-1919
Petitioner - Appellant:
BYIA BRUCE
Respondent - Appellee:
FRANK L. SHAW, Warden
Willie Freeman v. Frank Shaw
as 09-1904
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIE FREEMAN
Respondent - Appellee:
FRANK L. SHAW
Felix Torres v. US Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals et al
as 8:2009cv00264
Plaintiff:
Felix Torres, Jr
Defendant:
US Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, The Advisory Committee On Rules Of Practice And Internal Operating Procedures Of The United States Court Of Appeals For The Ninth Circuit, Peter L Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Miller v. Shaw et al
as 1:2009cv00382
Petitioner:
Henry E Miller
Respondent:
Frank L. Shaw
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
