Cases 91 - 100 of 345
Sennet v. St Martin Parish Correctional Facility et al
as 6:2017cv01185
Plaintiff:
DeMarqus D Sennet
Defendant:
St Martin Parish Correctional Facility, U H C, Ronald J Theriot and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. McCain et al
as 1:2017cv01112
Plaintiff:
Elton W Martin
Defendant:
Sandy McCain, Sandra Sibley, McVay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Boutte et al
as 2:2017cv07683
Plaintiff:
Sheryl Lee Marie Martin
Defendant:
Frederick Boutte
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson v. Valle et al
as 1:2017cv00664
Plaintiff:
Mario Jermaine Wilson
Defendant:
B Valle, J A Barnhart, John Bartlett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Valle et al
as 2:2017cv04845
Plaintiff:
Mario Jermaine Wilson
Defendant:
B Valle, J. A. Barnhart, John Bartlett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hinson v. Arbuckle et al
as 5:2017cv00260
Plaintiff:
Jason Hinson
Defendant:
Rodney Arbuckle and Kyle Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Batiste v. St Martin Parish
as 6:2017cv00251
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Batiste
Defendant:
Sheriffs Office St Martin Parish
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Lasalle Corrections Corp et al
as 1:2017cv00109
Defendant:
Lasalle Corrections Corp, Winn Correctional Center, Keith Deville and others
Plaintiff:
Cecil Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodfin et al v. State Of Louisiana
as 3:2016cv00791
Defendant:
Martin Correctional Institution, State Of Louisiana and State of Florida Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Robert A. Woodfin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Hearns et al
as 5:2016cv01514
Plaintiff:
Alonzo E Allen
Defendant:
Staff of David Wade Correctional Center, Pamela Hearns, Bruce Fuller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
