Cases 91 - 100 of 600
Perry v. Erdos et al
as 1:2021cv00225
Defendant:
Warden Ron Erdos, Deputy Warden Cynthia Davis, Unit Manager Harris and others
Plaintiff:
Marquez B. Perry
Interested Party:
State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Methena v. State of Ohio, et al
as 1:2021cv00652
Defendant:
Mansfield Correctional Institution and State of Ohio
Plaintiff:
Joshua Charles Methena
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Powers v. Eddy
as 2:2021cv01195
Defendant:
Andrew Eddy, M.D.
Plaintiff:
Floyd Powers
Interested Party:
State of Ohio -Interested Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heiney v. Attorney General for the State of Ohio
as 3:2021cv00501
Respondent:
Attorney General for the State of Ohio, Cynthia B. Mausser, Donna Moore and others
Petitioner:
Jake Paul Heiney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gant v. Elam et al
as 1:2021cv00117
Defendant:
Warden Chae Harris, Director Annette Smith-Chambers, John/Jane Doe 1-5 and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Gant
Interested Party:
State of Ohio, Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Methena v. State of Ohio, et al
as 1:2021cv00326
Defendant:
Mansfield Correctional Institution and State of Ohio
Plaintiff:
Joshua Methena
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rockey v. State Of Ohio
as 3:2021cv00026
Petitioner:
johnathan rockey
Respondent:
State of Ohio State Of Ohio and Warden, Lebanon Correctional Institute
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MIX v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF OHIO
as 2:2021cv00126
Petitioner:
ERICA SHANEE' MIX
Respondent:
The Attorney General of the State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kyte v. Hamilton County Jail et al
as 1:2021cv00019
Plaintiff:
Megan Kyte
Defendant:
State of Ohio/ U.S. Attorney's Office and Hamilton County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mincey v. The State of Ohio et al
as 1:2020cv01039
Defendant:
Prosecutor Elizabeth Katherine Pridemore, The State of Ohio and Judge Allen Court Room
Plaintiff:
Jatone D. Mincey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
