Cases 91 - 100 of 825
Graves v. Moulds et al
as 2:2021cv00105
Plaintiff:
Wilson Earl Graves, III
Defendant:
Jamie Moulds, Jeff Monk, Vince Williams and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Mills
as 1:2021cv00109
Petitioner:
Timothy A. Williams
Respondent:
Superintendent Andrew Mills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Burton v. Rankin County Circuit Court et al
as 3:2021cv00439
Defendant:
Rankin County Circuit Court and William R. Labarre
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Walter Burton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Barlow et al
as 3:2021cv00401
Defendant:
Ofc. Dillon, Nurse Barlow, Carrie Williams and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Charles Smith, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Middlebrooks
as 1:2021cv00164
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Montrel Williams
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Scott Middlebrooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pinkston v. Management & Training Corporation et al
as 3:2021cv00301
Defendant:
Unknown Rice, Unit Manager Unknown Nielson or Nelson, Dr. Unknown Arnold and others
Plaintiff:
Chaz Pinkston
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kidd v. Williams
as 2:2021cv00056
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Kunta Kidd
Defendant:
Jessie Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. USA
as 1:2021cv00108
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Kristopher Michael Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Williams v. Reiser
as 3:2021cv00204
Plaintiff:
Anthony DeJuan Williams
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Warden S. Reiser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ewing v. Cain et al
as 1:2021cv00069
Defendant:
CID of Greene County, Unknown William, Burl Cain and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Ricky Ewing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
