Cases 101 - 110 of 781
HARNEY v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv08971
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HARNEY
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STEPHENS v. COUNTY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2016cv08995
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER STEPHENS
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CAMDEN, CAMDEN COUNTY BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS, WARDEN OF CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCWHORTER v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv09000
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MCWHORTER, III
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PETERS v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv09004
Plaintiff:
BRUCE W. PETERS
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
INGRAM v. CAMDEN COUNTY FREEHOLDERS et al
as 1:2016cv08958
Plaintiff:
NATHAN INGRAM
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY FREEHOLDERS and CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JENKINS v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv08973
Plaintiff:
TREMAYNE JENKINS
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CANNON v. CAMDEN COUNTY FREEHOLDERS et al
as 1:2016cv08957
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH CANNON
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY FREEHOLDERS and CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOOTH v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv08953
Plaintiff:
HOWARD L. BOOTH
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LANUTTI v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv08952
Plaintiff:
KELLY LYNN LANUTTI
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOORE v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv08972
Plaintiff:
RASHEED MOORE
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
