Cases 101 - 110 of 160
Vello v. Delbalso et al
as 3:2017cv00879
Plaintiff:
Jose Vello
Defendant:
Delbalso, PA. Board of Probation & Parole of Harrisburg, PA., McCormick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BURRIS v. DELBALSO et al
as 2:2017cv02161
Petitioner:
PERRY BURRIS
Respondent:
TERESA DELBALSO, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Miller v. Machoga, et al
as 3:2017cv00771
Plaintiff:
Ryan E Miller
Defendant:
Machoga, Swartz, Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHIELDS v. DELBALSO et al
as 2:2017cv01507
Petitioner:
KENNY SHIELDS
Respondent:
DELBALSO and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott v. Delbalso et al
as 3:2017cv00253
Petitioner:
Reginald C. Scott
Respondent:
Theresa Delbalso and Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JACOBS v. DELBALSO et al
as 2:2017cv00569
Petitioner:
SHAWN OMAR JACOBS
Respondent:
DELBALSO, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF __________ and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF _____________
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
RAMSEY v. DELBALSO et al
as 1:2017cv00030
Petitioner:
JOHN RAMSEY
Respondent:
THERESA DELBALSO, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR THE COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY, PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JACKSON v. DELBALSO et al
as 2:2017cv00491
Petitioner:
DAVID JACKSON
Respondent:
THERESA DELBALSO, SETH WILLIAMS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PHOMMA v. DELBALSO et al
as 2:2017cv00499
Petitioner:
KHAMPHOY PHOMMA
Respondent:
THERESA DELBALSO, R. SETH WILLIAMS and JOSH SHAPIRO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WHITE v. DELBALSO et al
as 2:2017cv00443
Petitioner:
MELVIN WHITE
Respondent:
TERESA DELBALSO, SETH WILLIAMS and JOSH SHAPIRO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
