Cases 101 - 110 of 2,420
Russell v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv07915
Plaintiff:
Donnell Russell
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Vasquez v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv09169
Petitioner:
Ismeal Vasquez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Cohen v. United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv08099
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Cohen
Defendant:
United States of America, Eddie Anderson, Emery McCoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
George v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv09444
Petitioner:
Robert George
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Campbell v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv08908
Plaintiff:
Lavaughn Campbell
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jones v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv08313
Petitioner:
Rafael Arden Jones
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Cheng v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv07602
Plaintiff:
Sheng-Wen Cheng
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv07775
Plaintiff:
Amaurys Hernandez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Williams v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv08338
Petitioner:
John T. Williams
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
El-Hage v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv08426
Petitioner:
Wadih Elias El-Hage
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
