Cases 101 - 110 of 210
CORMIER v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 5:2021cv00218
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA, WALTER BERRY, PETRILLION WHIPPLE and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN CORMIER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2021cv01920
Plaintiff:
Randy Edwards
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Timothy Ward and Georgia Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaw v. Ward et al
as 4:2021cv00084
Defendant:
Robert Toole, Cedric Taylor, Timothy Ward and others
Plaintiff:
Dexter Shaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OUTLER v. STATE OF GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al.
as 1:2021cv00049
Defendant:
Ofc Taraus Grimsley, Ofc Timothy Davis, WARDEN TAMARSHE SMITH and others
Plaintiff:
Angel Manuel Ortiz and SANDRA OUTLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roller v. Holloway et al
as 4:2021cv00065
Defendant:
Crystal Holloway, Jeanie Kasper, Ricky H. Foskey and others
Plaintiff:
Jackie Ray Roller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Milledge v. Ward et al
as 1:2021cv00052
Plaintiff:
Willie James Milledge
Defendant:
Barbara Colon, Timothy Ward, Ms. Champion and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MEREDITH v. WARD
as 1:2021cv00042
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF GEORGIA (NOTICE), TIMOTHY WARD and WARDEN STEVE UPTON
Petitioner:
KENNETH WAYNE MEREDITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Young v. Ward et al
as 4:2021cv00020
Plaintiff:
Damon Young
Defendant:
RN Cocran, Alisa Evans, Jack Koon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stovall v. GA Dept. of Corrections et al
as 1:2021cv00584
Defendant:
GA Operations Div., Kendarlin McMillian, Juanita Thorpe and others
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Stovall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meredith v. Ward
as 5:2021cv00022
Respondent:
Warden Timothy Ward
Not Classified By Court:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Petitioner:
Kenneth Wayne Meredith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
