Cases 101 - 110 of 202
Gamble v. Conway et al
as 5:2013cv00327
Plaintiff:
Bennie L. Gamble, Jr.
Defendant:
Jack Conway, William Robert Long, Jr., Darren W. Peckler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gamble v. Peckler et al
as 5:2013cv00328
Plaintiff:
Bennie L. Gamble, Jr.
Defendant:
Darren W. Peckler, Joni H. Terry, Jack Conway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gamble v. Commonwealth of Kentucky et al
as 5:2013cv00308
Plaintiff:
Bennie L. Gamble, Jr.
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Kentucky, Corrections Corporation of America, Kentucky Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Estep v. USA
as 0:2013cv07295
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
John H. Estep
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Alson v. USA
as 6:2013cv07292
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Elisa H. Alston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Kerr v. Sepanek
as 0:2013cv00079
Petitioner:
Lonnie H. Kerr
Respondent:
M. Sepanek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Harrison v. Breshear et al
as 3:2013cv00386
Plaintiff:
James Harrison
Defendant:
Steve Breshear, J. Michael Brown, LaDonna H. Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spigelman v. Samuels et al
as 6:2013cv00074
Plaintiff:
Joel Steven Spigelman
Defendant:
Charles E. Samuels, Jr., Richard B. Ives, H. Quay and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
King v. Thompson et al
as 3:2013cv00322
Plaintiff:
Susan King
Defendant:
LaDonna H. Thompson, Kentucky Parole Board and Kentucky Division of Probation & Parole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Donovan v. Thompson
as 3:2013cv00255
Petitioner:
John Patrick Donovan
Respondent:
LaDonna H. Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
