Cases 101 - 110 of 120,542
Garcia Nava v. Lundy
as 3:2024cv02808
Petitioner:
Juan L. Garcia Nava
Respondent:
Warden Leanna Lundy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Lucas v. Placer County Superior Court et al
as 2:2024cv01336
Petitioner:
David Lee Lucas
Respondent:
Placer County Superior Court and Brandon Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Oscar Quintero Jimenez v. Warden
as 5:2024cv01016
Petitioner:
Oscar Quintero Jimenez
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
James Thomas Ruiz v. G. Sanchez Jr. et al
as 2:2024cv03897
Plaintiff:
James Thomas Ruiz
Defendant:
G. Sanchez, Jr., Zunaga, Crosby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(HC) Corderick v. Warden
as 1:2024cv00546
Petitioner:
Dewayne Gage Corderick
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Truschke-Harpster v. Tuolumne County Jail
as 1:2024cv00547
Plaintiff:
Tammi Truschke-Harpster
Defendant:
Tuolumne County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elghembri v. California Dept. of Correction & Rehabilitation et al
as 3:2024cv02769
Plaintiff:
Ahmed Mohamed Elghembri
Defendant:
California Dept. of Correction & Rehabilitation and Ronald Broomfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elghembri v. Doe, Dentist et al
as 3:2024cv02771
Plaintiff:
Ahmed Mohamed Elghembri
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Dentist, John Doe, Dentist and Theodore Ng
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elghembri v. White et al
as 3:2024cv02773
Plaintiff:
Ahmed Mohammad Elghembri
Defendant:
Dr. White, Rachel Chen and California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kinnamon v. Thich
as 3:2024cv02784
Plaintiff:
Todd Lee Kinnamon
Defendant:
Thich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
