Cases 101 - 110 of 6,421
Kim v. Gray
as 1:2023cv12584
Petitioner:
Daniel Larry Kim
Respondent:
Dean Gray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill v. FMC Devens et al
as 1:2023cv12581
Plaintiff:
Raffeal Jerome Hill
Defendant:
FMC Devens and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deleo v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2023cv12576
Petitioner:
Ralph Francis Deleo
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Coolidge House
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wholey et al v. Bradley et al
as 1:2023cv12566
Plaintiff:
John F Wholey, Jr.
Defendant:
James Keefe, Honorable Judge Heather Bradley, Judge James Byrne and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Tyree v. Healey
as 1:2023cv12518
Plaintiff:
William M. Tyree
Defendant:
Maura T. Healey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rios v. Souza Baranowski Correctional Center
as 1:2023cv12527
Plaintiff:
Ray Luis Rios
Defendant:
Souza Baranowski Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv12525
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv12459
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Martin v. Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2023cv12454
Petitioner:
Deana Martin
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Evans v. USA DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE - ALL ENTRIES ARE TO BE MADE IN CRIMINAL CASE 09-cr-10345
as 1:2023cv12553
Petitioner:
Lejuan Evans
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
